Good luck trying to find Halo 3, Project Gotham Racing 4, or Mass Effect on PC any time soon. Oh, that's right, you don't care about these games anyways.
Basically you have one guy, without any inside information or facts, that thinks the logical way would be for this game to eventually appear on PS3.
If all things would reduce to logic, we would have all 3rd games on all consoles, leaving the exclusives to first parties only. Why? It would be the logical thing to do, and would bring the most money to the developers. We all know this is not the case.
We know you are searching through heaven and earth to find some dirty news on Bioshock and bring this game down for us 360 owners. You can stop trying, as your attempts have been futile and will continue to be.
Bioshock plays awesome on my 360, there are no problems with it. This is not a "Sad Conclusion".
How can you go from "it'd be wrong to think the game wouldn't be released on Sony's console at a later date" to an actual confirmation??? Why are you guys reaching out so much for this???
The guy is basically saying "he thinks" the logical way would be for this to be ported over to the PS3 in time. That is no good, pure speculation and far from a confirmation.
Xbox 360 version FTW???
They can prefer the PS3 (they are Sony fans), doesn't mean it will look better on the PS3.
So what if the PS3 is the lead platform. It can still be better on the 360 anyways, especially if both versions get the same development time.
It doen't matter that it is Konami. The PS3 is harder to develop for for anyone (Ubisoft comments to the contrary are pure PR attempts to sell GRAW 2 on PS3). If the PS3 is the lead platform, and you guys know that Konami is a loyal Sony supporter... what would you say if this game turns out better on the 360??? Would you guys finally admit that the PS3 is not all that that Sony hyped it up to be???
but then again, it is Amazon. I don't consider Amazon sales as anything significant in the overall picture (they count for less than 1% of total software/hardware sales)
First there is no PC version and second, the delay has been proved false.
Although I agree with your points, those screenshots can't be called a comparison anyways. Sorry but that is the plain truth, regardless of any other details.
There is no way this can be called a comparison, not even remotely. Whoever did this had the clear intention of making the PS3 look better. Anyone can do a comparison like this and make each system look better. The only way you could tell would be to have the same levels/positions, etc... to compare.
This thread FAILS in all levels.
Well, GRAW2 for the PS3 looks noticeably worse than the 360 version (based on the demo), so maybe they are just trying to rile up the Sony fanbase and get more sales???
I don't get Achievements like the 360 version (adding tons of replay value)
There is no rumble
I am stuck with my puny monitor instead of playing it on my 40" 1080p HDTV
360 all the way baby!
Remember we are just talking about the UK, not Europe as a whole. 1 million for the UK isn't bad at all.
If the invitation thatguy (post 5.1) posted is true, then I don't know if I should be excited for this, giving that it mentioned:
"be among the first to play the most highly anticipated titles slated for release this holiday season."
Meaning more stuff that we already know of... I want to see 2008 dammit!!!
Isn't this game "canned" for the PS3???
that this will happen. Aug 28th is right around the corner, and an event like this would have garnered a lot of media attention by now.
In spite of what they might say now, the 360 version will look/play better in the end. we just have to wait for the reviews.
Maybe Sony hardware, but with MS online system. I have both systems and Xbox Live is superior to PSN in almost every aspect. Oh crap!, I forgot that I pay 4 bucks a month for it... I am getting ripped off (not)